From what is in the article, I am still trying to understand what is illegal about the presence of the Mkoyans? According to the article, they came with the full knowledge of the government and have gone through the process (though losing) to become legal residents. There is room for a complaint about the slowness of our system and, perhaps, the affect of local politics on the fact that the Mkoyans are still here, but that does not make them illegal aliens.
So, we have some guy here (I never read Mr. Navarette before, and see no reason to ever bother with his tripe again) who uses an incorrect term and some sort of twisted reasoning (I’m being generous with the word ‘reasoning’) to try and prove that people aren’t againt ILLEGAL ALIENS, but only use that as a foil to bash Mexicans. Absolutely shameless and inane.
I’ll tell what, Navarette, when the Mkoyan’s final appeal is rejected and they go on the lam to avoid deportation, then get back to us. Of course, in that case, almost all of the people against ILLEGAL ALIENS will say that they should be found, scooped up, and deported as soon as possible.
The amnesty folks have no shame, and less sense. Pathetic.
