PJ Media

“FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!! So the “judicial activism” everyone who loses a case bitches about can actually be as much, if not more, a result of the crappy defense than that of an “activist” judge.”

Is THAT the windmill that you’ve been tilting at? That the pro-6 lawyers sucked?

This isn’t exactly “Revealed Truth”, y’know. Heck, Walker himself apparently was flabbergasted at their suckage.
They phoned it in.

But that doesn’t mean that Walker isn’t likewise guilty of judicial activism either. In fact, in this case I’d say that the respondents’ attorneys doing the palooka makes no difference.

“Note that there is criticism of the judge favoring the plaintiff because of gay. If he was straight, and he ruled for the defense, the other side would be able to say the same thing.”

I agree, which is why I haven’t flapped my soup-cooler about Walker’s homosexuality. Because when this matter is settled in Prop 8′s favor at the SCOTUS by what are reputed to be heterosexuals, then that’s gonna be the breaks.

“Uhm… Because they favor that side of the political chasm.”

I asked you to focus. Prop 8 was an initiative of the People of California, not the state government,(such as it is).

So why did the anti-8 folks sue Guv’nah “Kindergarten Cop” and Bucky the AG?

“Example please.”

Read the decision. The Plaintiffs and Walker are very careful to distinguish gay men from lesbians. It’s very peculiar. Is this some kind of homosexual protocol that I’m unaware of?