A Fine Argument for Gay Marriage, but a Flawed Legal Opinion
So is the record of convictions under now-unConstitutional Gun “Control” laws.
The fact that something is in case law doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a true fact or that it is correct.
(Dred Scott is “case law” too…)
It IS peculiar though, that Walker would cite precedent…which is tantamount to standing on legal tradition to attack the traditionally accepted and widely held definition of marriage.
Rather like Sirhan Sirhan claiming that if Bobby Kennedy were alive, he would want Sirhan released from prison.
But then that’s what to expect of a man who declares the majority of voters in a state to be “not rational”. He pre-judged this matter and filled in the middle part with case-law based rationalizations.
That’s okay, I’m sure it’s not the first time or the last time, but he isn’t fooling anyone.
The fact of the matter is that to be considered “married” by the state, you first need to seek a license FROM the state.
If you need a license to do it, then it ain’t a right.
