A Fine Argument for Gay Marriage, but a Flawed Legal Opinion
Tex, BJohnM, just ripped you a new one, sort like Judge Waters ripped the defense a new one. You haven’t a clue what you are talking about in terms of what purpose our Constitution serves. Just like you people twist and distort biblical passages to suit your own prejudices, you do the same with the Constitution. The Constitution is there to protect the minority. Majorities don’t need protecting.
History will pass your demographic by that is for sure. The nation will move forward with or without you in order to form a more perfect union. Your only investment in this is to, as Judge Waters wrote, “advance the belief that opposite-sex couples are morally superior to same-sex couples.” They’re not. You can’t handle that. Tough.





