A Fine Argument for Gay Marriage, but a Flawed Legal Opinion
I’d like to see two classes of marriage license. The first would be a Filial Marriage license (Class F) that would be a legal declaration of affection between one (or more) sentient beings. This is essentially the status of the marriage license as a result of this ruling. The second class would be a Biological Marriage license (Class B). To qualify a man and woman would have to produce DNA showing that they are the genetic parents of their offspring. This would benefit the children of the marriage (and society) by publicly documenting their lineage for medical and inheritance purposes. The judge’s ruling denies any biological significance to the marriage law and this would correct that deficiency. If society has no material interest in procreation why do we have an Endangered Species Act?
