A Fine Argument for Gay Marriage, but a Flawed Legal Opinion
I asked someone who argued for gay marriage recently, ‘what about those who want marriage to be more than two people?” and the URGENT, instant response was “well nobody’s asking for that!”
THe next day, I saw a news report on a group of poly-amourists who were petitioning for the definition of marriage to be broadened to include more than two people.
the next day.
It’s only a matter of time before someone sues for the right to marry his dog, because they clearly love each other and isn’t that what matters? LOVE? You’re so cruel to say no to LOVE!
And the poly-amourists have not dispersed, only gone quiet. Maybe after the appeal is upheld by the supreme court and two people of the same gender can finally, without remaining doubt, call themselves ‘married’, the polys will be back with lawyers to enforce their own demands.
And the bestialists. Cuz you can’t argue with love.
