PJ Media

“The parallels between homosexual marriage and interracial marriage may take a bit of fancy footwork to overcome.” What parallels?

Interacial marriage is between one man and one woman, over the age of consent, and not a direct blood relative, where the skin color of the one male and one female are of a different color. Because of the color of a person’s skin, they were treated differently under the law. This, of course, is unconstitutional.

One man marrying another man (or woman to woman) is NOT the same thing. A homosexual male could marry any woman over the age of consent, and not a blood relative, who would say yes. Therefore no discrimination was happening.