Thanks for the article. It communicates a very significant point, but I would say, a bit unwittingly. I was for JFK as a youngster. He was very far right of what the Democrats are today. But I learned even as a kid that if you elect a person perceived to be young and inexperienced in a very dangerous geopolitical situation, he will be purposely tested by the opposition, the existence of which cannot be safely denied. Kennedy was FAR more experienced and knowledgeable than Obama. Whether JFK was too “inexperienced” for the presidency of that time was a moot point. But I never, ever thought JFK was WEAK. Friends..we have an extremely serious problem here, because not only is the college kids’ favorite Obama inexperienced, his behavior shows him to be WEAK. This prompted Krauthammer to write the article about whether we should expect a dual presidency(like the Clintons) with the Obamas, which I fear would be the case.. As far as I am concerned Obama is a WEAK metrosexual, and our enemies already know that. Such weakness causes overreaction which is further proof of weakness. Aside from the women who are unhappy, my hope is the men will smell this problem and vote McCain. It is a much bigger problem than any single important policy issue.
