Wait a minute people. There is no credible evidence Saddam did not have WMD and we did find WMD after we liberated and improved his pest hole of a country. We never disproved the evidence attested to by two or maybe more of his generals that the WMD were moved out of Iraq during the Oct.-March lead up to the war. There are thousands like me who don’t accept the premise that WMD was the primary reason we enforced the UN Resolution Saddam was violating against him. Humanitarian reasons dictated as well that he go from the bottom of his rat hole to the end of a rope, a outcome of manifest justice we missed with Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro and all the other monopolists of power who so disgraced the last century. The WMD/lie argument never made much sense since
a. Every Iraqi general we captured claimed they were told that their forces had WMD and they trained and equipped their army in the belief they had ‘em.
b. Every WMD scientist we captured in Iraq confirmed that Saddam had ordered all of them (a dozen or so trained scientists with speciallized equipment) to reconstitute his cherished WMD programs.
Shortly after Saddam’s WMD’s were supposedly spirited out of Iraq pre liberation, WMD’s from some source were used against the Black Christians in Sudan and Darfur. Prejudiced idiots like Kucinich and Paul could not care less about their fellow humans since they’re probably religious bigots prejudiced against Black Africans.
So can we stop treating those who claim that Bush lied about Saddam’s WMD’s (verified by all his generals and scientists) as people who are actually sane? There are liars out there lying about this subject, but Bush is not one of them.
George Clarke
2008-06-12 09:51:36





