The Crusades were a defensive reaction to the Jihad of that time. Speaking of which, there was no mention of Jihad in this article. It’s gone on for 1400 years. And finally, ‘hope’ is not a strategy: “Young terrorists feel they have to wage their own war because their leaders have failed them. What the world needs, and most particularly the Arab and “Palestinian” entity, is exceptionally inspiring and forgiving leaders — the likes of Lincoln, Churchill, Franklin Roosevelt, Martin Luther King, Mandela, and Gandhi. Then there will be no need for a war on terror.”
When the Muslim Gandhi comes around, we’ll welcome him. And how do you explain Iran and Saudi Arabia. The Leaders are the Jihadis. The Leaders are the terrorists and funders of terror. If the young men full of testosterone believed that their leaders failed them, why aren’t they attacking those leaders instead of innocent infidels?
