Ted, you are becoming increasingly incoherent. However I will try to explain this to you slowly. Property rights are fundamental to the development and viability of a democratic society. Shaidles appeal is to the ideal that property rights should take precedence over any effort by the state to contravene this right. Given that Shaidle is a Canadian and the Macleans/Steyn matter is a Canadian issue it only follows that Canada’s failure to recognize the supremacy of property rights is in part a cause of the Mohammedan extortion attempts against Macleans and Steyn. In short the supremacy of property rights would have obviated the extortion attempt as it would be dismissed out of hand. Had you ever bothered to actually read Shaidle, or for that matter had the abilty to comprehend the written word, you would be well aware of her stance on property rights and wouldn’t have to bother makin stuff up about her;)
Oh and Ted how is it that I am focused on Shaidle being a bigot, you raised the issue, by the way that whole “reality based” nonsense is so 2004.
