Ted I have read through you URL and found them to both be lacking but your views on some of them borderline nazi/commie in understanding them.
http://www.fivefeetoffury.com/:entry:fivefeet-2008-06-01-0000/ So let me get this straight your angry that a person is pointing out that being oppressed is bad but being oppressed much worse is worse… I guess this comes down to a leftist idea its better to be oppressed by someone like stalin then that evil US government…
http://www.fivefeetoffury.com/:entry:fivefeet-2007-12-20-0010/ First context, Second facts?, Third anyone who knows anything is that the reason blacks went nuts down there wasn’t because they were black but because they were leftist and without government control this is what happens to leftist… they run amock. Thus comparing NO and africa which is very leftist is fairly reasonable… once again though context.
http://www.fivefeetoffury.com/:entry:fivefeet-2008-04-16-0005/ First context, Second facts?, Third even without much knowledge on the topic clearly this shows a pro-capitalists “sliver lining” view point… clearly this must be evil to anyone anti-capitalist… Also shows anti-government control and free thought… things that most surely be controlled and banned from blacks every having/using.
http://www.fivefeetoffury.com/:entry:fivefeet-2008-04-16-0003/ This one here pretty much sums up that you are either a nazi/commie or wanna be of that view. Private property is pretty much the most important right ever… it is the basis for the 1st,2nd,4th Amendments and many other laws in the US. If you don’t have the right to private property you have no right to own anything… even yourself. You have no right to self defense or free speech. Clearly your understanding of basic human rights and the law are lacking.
http://www.warrenkinsella.com/index.php?entry=entry080310-230224 Context?, Facts?, Many of them are anti-PC and are truths if your not PC.
http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2007/04/24/MarkSteyn/ Context?, This is a leftist whine for the most part… nothing quoted matches the “PC view”… its also very anti-leftist which explains the whining and huge attempt to put words and views into the story not said/quoted(because they weren’t said thus can’t be quoted). The title is very miss leading since it says “Massacres prompt pundit to slag old folks, paraplegics and dead students.” Expect the fact that the direct quote when read says the “old folks” were the heros….
Mid title Senior citizens as ‘trivialities’. Context, Quoted info in no way applies to views express by “reviewer”, Some truths,
Next “People in wheelchairs” Pro-safety work place comments turned to be anti-disable comments… Clearly we should have ppl in wheel chair fighting in the armed forces…
Last “‘Bravery’ of hijackers”, Context, Semi-truth, Unreported quotes, equal quote calling hitler a genius for sucking all of germany and most of the world into believing that socialism is the greatest thing alive and that he was the greatest thing alive… that does take genius….
http://tinyurl.com/4a6tob Context, Semi-truths, Some toolish quote if true, Lot of “reviewing”/”rewriting”.
http://tinyurl.com/4mrjsg Facts, Boring, long, zero quotes or links to supposed “offense”. Zero facts, WTF does this have to do with anything… if your posting to point out a statement said that in this is claim to be racist/said at all post directly to the comments not a “review” which has zero facts on it… waste of time.
http://tinyurl.com/5xk6vm Some random guy, was taken down, happens all the time to everyone(huffignton post does this stuff and leaves it up as well as many many other groups). Unless you can find some proof that this wasn’t just one person or that that is the view of the website its pretty weak…
http://tinyurl.com/4zhn3j Very weak… the quote directly links the “muslims” in question with the actions of the mafia IE they are directly committing a crime. Over blown and stupid.
http://www.ottawamenscentre.com/news/20041025_preacher.htm Exposes racism against white, exposes PC, Claims crimes have been committed under the law and should be charged. Doesn’t have anything that support your view unless in a very very narrow focus of a PC viewer. Also has same quote as above… in which it is directly referring to the fact that a “real” crime is being committed not just speech.
http://tinyurl.com/42tk5o Zero context, Zero facts, Zero quotes that have any purpose to what “reviewer” says they say, anyone can sue anyone in a court of law… the court should find in favor of both free speech and facts… “reviewer” seems to think that anyone should be unchallenged in what they say. The “reviewer”/text really has no value in this debate.
If this is the best you can do… linking to mostly second hand info and clearly bias “reviewers” as well as info thats completely unrelated to your view point or goal of expressing said value point then your big on fail. I took the time to review your info and I from past info have been under the view that mr. stern tended to be a bit of a right wing nut…. the info provided by you seems to counter that and make him look much more rational and centrist… that or your just really poor with rebuttals.
