A Comment About
Writing for PJM Helped Make Me Enemy of the State Number #38
July 7, 2010 - 12:05 am
miscellaneous
2010-07-07 08:03:57
If I wrote a cancer research paper and did the following:
1. Picked patients that supported my theories instead of random sampling
2. Hard coded values in a computer model that demonstrated my theory
3. Conviently Lost my research notes
4. *I can’t remember the one other malarkey certain, “scientists,” pulled
5. and apparently “Corrected” my data where it didn’t support my theories
What would peer review consider my research? Is this not a direct parallel of what the current AGW researchers (fear mongers or eco terrorists – Earth First any one) have done?
