If that’s your argument, let me take your metaphor ONE step farther.
Maybe these women are not willing to vote for a guy of a certain age that needs a medicine cabinet full of little blue pills to perform.
Obama cannot speak intelligently and with facts off teleprompter. His list of accomplishments is thin. He appears to have gotten the few positions he has attained by something other than achievement and brains. Folks in high schools with mostly B’s do not get into the University of Chicago as a general rule. It used to be that one could not be the President of the Harvard Review without having achieved the top grade in the class. It also used to be they clerked with supreme court associates and at the very least with an associate of one of the major appeals courts without exception. It is unique that one is the President of the Harvard Law Review and doesn’t clerk for any prestigious court AND never publishes a single article. That’s right UNIQUE. Usually, one does not win elections by getting the other candidates thrown out on a technicality. He’s done that twice. Now, he’s received the democratic nomination (sic) under highly suspicious circumstances. One, there have been lots of overly-weighted caucuses in states that usually don’t have caucuses. Two, he voluntarily pulled his name of a ballot and still managed to get pledged delegates from that race while taking voters who voted from a different candidate.
Can it just be that women are keener judges of who can cut it and who is a faker?
kat
