Libertyship46
2010-06-06 04:02:04

Perhaps actual WMDs were not sent to Syria, but components for WMDs went to Syria? This could especially be true for biological weapons, such as anthrax or smallpox. Maybe Saddam Hussein didn’t have enough time to finish making his weapons, but he did have enough loose materials to eventually make them?

Maybe that’s why Syria is holding on to them, because one day it plans to have its own WMDs and now it has the components to make them? My bet is that all of the materials Saddam Hussein had to make biological weapons are now in Syria and some nation had better find out (and quickly) what that country actually has. A war between Israel, Syria, and Iran, along with their proxies Hamas and Hezbollah, is about to take place, especially if Iran gets nuclear weapons. The West MUST know what Syria has to prevent an even bigger catastrophe in both the Middle East and in the rest of the world.

Remember, if Syria does have the components for WMDs, it could easily give them to some Islamic terrorist organization, such as Hezbollah, and then just deny it did so and say that the terrorists got the materials from some supply depot in Iraq, which is where they were actually created. The world would then place the blame for supplying the terrorists on rogue elements in a semi-lawless nation rather than blaming Syria, the country that actually gave the terrorists the weapons in the first place. Is anyone at the CIA reading this?