DocNeaves
2010-05-27 17:36:40
Hate to burst your bubble, but Roosevelt was a progressive, regardless whether he was a Republican or not. We keep trying to tell you, it’s not about R and D. It’s about conservative or progressive. The socialists are the ones who want one world government, under communist rule, but they are in both parties. Roosevelt himself was a Federalist, and you can’t invoke a Federalist’s argument as to why State’s Rights isn’t legal. It’s sort of like taking a dieticians opinion of a honeybun. Not exactly unbiased. Roosevelt would have been against State’s Rights if it had been codified into law, because it weakened the Federal Government. He considered this a bad thing, as do you, I’m sure. We consider it a good thing.
