Science is something you can duplicate in the laboratory and measure, and achieve the same result every time. Which scientest duplicated form transitional evolution in the laboratory. Darwin did not so it is not scientific evolution. It is a theory, based on alot of scientific evidence. On the other side, divine intervention may well be true, but being supernatural it is not science. Because we can certainly breed dogs, horses and peas for particular characteristics, over dozens of generations, does not mean the elephant is related in kinship to the ameoba. Maybe it is, but alas there is so much we don’t know. All theories at this point are at least viable if not equal (and not necessarily exclusionary of the alternatives) so I do not believe any candidates adherence to any genesis tale is a political deal breaker.
