Dear Jack Strawn:
Your silly post barely warrants a response – I know you’re seething because I’ve dismembered one or two of your convoluted posts at this site in the past – I recognize the sting in your ad-hominem laden vitriol against me. In any event, you don’t seem to comprehend my point, and that is that expansionist Jihad will continue whether we defeat al Qaida or not. The pace and fury of Jihad hinges largely on the capacity of Muslims to wage Jihad, and opportunity. For this argument, I’m mainly concerned with Muslim insurrection within the Western edifice. Muslim presence in the West guarantees that Muslims will continue to have the critical opportunity to wage Jihad to spread Islam within our domains thereby subverting our society.
Unchecked unregulated Muslim immigration, matched with massive amounts of loot obtained through unearned oil revenues will guarantee their ability to continue Jihad. We are doing little to impede these mechanisms.
When/if we destroy al Qaida, or temporarily install weak quasi-democratic institutions in primary Islamic cesspools like Iraq or Afghanistan, their 1400 year ongoing Islamic Jihad will not be blunted. Rest assured that the full blown nightmares of what you label “Islamism”, (and I simply refer to as Islam) will eventually manifest if Islam remains intact. We see this everywhere that Islam exists today, from Turkey, Thailand, the Philippines, or “Palestine”. Muslims are not fighting the strands of radicalism — everywhere across the board they are succumbing to ever more viscious and purist manifestations of Islam.
At this juncture I’m not so interested in saving Muslims from the visciousness of their disgusting creed than I am interested in protecting us from being perpetually victimized subverted and slaughtered by them in our own (as yet) non-Muslim democratic homelands. Yet you continue to adduce the most sinister motives on my part. As I stated, your rambling post barely warrants a response, but I thought it might be productive for other readers to clarify what is right about my position in juxtaposition to what is wrong in your rambling post.
