A Comment About

Joe Stack Did Not Have Tea Party Principles

February 24, 2010 - 12:00 am - by Andie Brownlow
AF_Vet
2010-03-02 10:54:18

21. Mr YY:
“The Goverment attacked people whom they knew wouldn’t/couldn’t defend themselves or fight back.”

Nice try at moral equivalence, but the people of Ruby Ridge, could and did fight back. They were armed, ready and fired back at authorities acting within the bounds of the law. Try again.

“Specially in Ruby Ridge the government forces intentionally targeted children.”

Liar. Proof please. (Good luck with this one…)

“McVeigh’s declared he wasn’t aware of the employee day care center inside the building with children? And that he would have changed target had he know. This is just to set the record straight.”

His fault that he didn’t know…And I call both him and you bald faced liars. How very nice of you to try and cover for Mr. McVeigh. He says he would have changed his target? Really? To what? And can you say that he wasn’t just trying to get a softer sentence? Timothy McVeigh was coward, and so are you for covering for his atrocity.

Overall, you provide a very poor deflection of the original statement of Mr. McVeigh or Mr. Stack “not being cowards” by bringining in the ‘sins’ of the government.

You sir, suck. I feel sorry for you.