JTK
2010-02-24 18:50:56

If climate change is a lie, why not prove it? If the big companies really believed it wasn’t happening, that is what they would do right? If they truly thought that science would show global warming wasn’t real, if it was as easy and obvious as most here assume, they could just put a tiny portion of their profits from last year into a research team to go over this climategate data. Instead they spend money on public relations firms and spin doctors to fight in the media. Doesn’t their choice to spend money on fighting the perception of global warming as being true rather than funding research to prove it is not true an admission of sorts?

Seriously, explain that part to me. Why all this talk about climategate and yet only the same two or three emails get thrown around? Where is all this supposedly fake data, where are the analyses of that fake data showing what is faked and who faked it? This is cheap and easy, its been months… how long does it take? Why do the people who have actually read all of the climategate emails say that most of this hubbub is bull?

These are all valid questions, ones that I hope someone here will take the time to consider. Maybe, just maybe, you are being decieved by massive corporations spending big money on spinning this issue.