Climategate Meets the Law: Senator Inhofe to Ask for DOJ Investigation (Pajamas Media/PJTV Exclusive)
#343 Joe: Before you worry about Inhofe’s funding you might consider the articles here and here. It turns out that the Climate Research Unit receives a lot of funding from Big Oil; they also receive a lot of funding a number of businesses that have a stake in encouraging carbon trading. In Inhofe is taited, so should the CRU be tainted.
#373 Matthew: Besides 2035, there are acknowledged errors in the misstatement of conclusions about the impact of warming on hurricanes, on Amazon rain forests, and on the impact of sea level rise in the Netherlands. They’ve also acknowledged that they made extensive use of non-reviewed advocacy material, treating it as peer-reviewed science. While it’s not strictly a retraction, Murari Lal, one of the section editors, also acknowledged that the report was written as a political advocacy document to have the maximum effect on policymakers rather than as the balanced scientific presentation required by the IPCC charter.
There is a link to the Inhofe report above; reading it will give you a more extensive list of errors in the IPCC reports.
