I don’t know if he’s been mentioned, but check out Andrew Neather (I won’t suggest google anymore). He’s an Englishman, a speech writer for several leaders, who boasted about the immigration policies of England and, IIRC, Western Europe in general. He stated, candidly, that the goal of the policies were to obliterate any vestige of “Britishness” in GB!
Given the similar mind-set of European and American progressives, can anyone seriously doubt that the morons at BHS (and beyond) have the same end-goal? They’re all about destroying Western Culture. Nothing less.
I hate the idea of suppressing free speech, but it’s insanely suicidal to allow segments of a society, any society, to openly advocate the destruction of that society.
I don’t know exaclty where the line is to be drawn, but clearly a society that would suppress those that agitate for openness and liberty should not be legitimized or treated as equals(Iran, China, NK, Syria, etc.)
A society that stands for personal liberty and freedom must be defended, even from within. Again, I don’t know at what point we can legitimately do so, but as Supreme Court Justice Jackson said, “The Constitution isn’t a suicide pact.”
I feel a sense of urgency about the events unfolding before us, both large and small, that spell the disintegration of the Republic. At what point can we act?
