griefer
2008-05-27 05:44:58
Here’s the gist.
The judge stated that “all the children were at risk, either of being abused or of becoming abusers.” CPS operated on that judgement.
The appellate court disagreed, and ordered the return of SOME of the children, citing argument that assessing risk on case by case basis should have been involved in removing individual children.
12 of the children were returned.
The rest remain in state temporary custody.
The apellate court’s decision is being appealed itself.
Where does that make CPS demons that are trying to “kidnap” children as darleen maintains?
