A Comment About

War Is Too Serious to Involve Liberals

December 18, 2009 - 12:00 am - by Frank J. Fleming
Bohemond
2009-12-18 14:10:26

John Grunwald:
“The masses of Iraq and Afghanistan do not take kindly to folks touting “liberty”… Short of nuking population centers and population-wide chemical and biological weapon attacks, there is little chance of a ‘victory’ in Iraq or Afghanistan.”

Do you actually know anything about Iraq, especially the events of the last three years? Apparently not, since you seem to be completely unaware that “the masses of Iraq” turned on the al-Qaeda psychopaths and that between the citizenry, the tribal militias, the Iraqi Army and police, and the US military, we achieved….get ready for it… victory. Which of course you will blindly deny because to you anything but defeat in Iraq is, to quote The Princess Bride, “inconceivable.”
—-
There’s hardly any point in bothering to refute your tired old atheist’s nonsense on Christ-as-commie, except to point out that we conservatives are in fact doing far more of the actual feeding the poor and tending the sick than you self-proclaimedly ‘compassionate’ liberals.

“the conservative movement, with its touting of nationalism, guns, war, violence, intolerance, hatred and lack of concern for their human brothers and sisters…Conservatism these days could easily be seen to be a catch-all word for jingoistic ignorance, sociopathic nationalism, and/or religious zealotry”

Oh, I get it. You’re just a narrow-minded bigot. But then, we knew that from the moment you declared yourself a “well-educated liberal”- meaning, of course, a baselessly conceited adolescent with a sheepskin.