64. mr:
Phranc # 63… I am so glad we are having a civil discusion[sic] here. as for “SIC” it is not the lack of education it is more of English as a second language.. I just asked one of my staff and he explained it to… however he did not know what the lettrs[sic] satnd[sic] for but I goy[sic] the gist of what it menas [sic]…
As for proof about the Vatican, is there a document or directive etc…. in writing? I think not… perhaps the word encourage should be replaced by blid[sic] eye but then again if you are turning a blid[sic] eye you are encouraging.. all you have to do is read the papers conservetive[sic] and liberal alike how archdiosis[sic] (is this correct the spelling) went bankrupt because of child molestation… as for you knowing a handful of them I am not shoked [sic]they are among us and we would never know…
—————————————————————
Not knowing what [sic] means is absolutely a lack of education. Knowing comes from being educated. And since you can’t admittedly come up with any proof the Vatican encourages the rape of children its nice to see you admit to lying earlier even if you had to backtrack on it. Turning a blind eye is not the same as encouraging. Maybe you should just stop using English as you don’t know what the words mean. Educate your self first.
You have no credibility.
