If a person is going to wave their sexual behavior in front of the world like a rainbow flag on a windy day, then yes, making taboo the discussing of homosexual sexual behavior is a demand for preferential treatment.
Accusing those who does not agree that marriage should be redefined to include people of the same sex as phobic is an attempt to suppress discussion and is an expectation of preferential treatment.
Suppressing discussion of whether the young can be influenced by the sexual conduct of adults is an expectation of preferential treatment.
Demanding that the world accept that homosexual sexual behavior is strictly in the DNA and any attempt to discuss the subject is attacked is expecting preferential treatment.
Sexual Equality should not require preferential treatment and should not suppress or forbid discussion about the topic.
It’s not sexual equality, it is sexual superiority because it cannot stand under questioning or discussion so must make taboo the voice of scrutiny or opposition or questioning.
