Nidal Hasan and Fort Hood: A Study in Muslim Doctrine (Part 1)
>Can a non-believer convert to Christianity (in your >opinion) by simply accepting Jesus Christ as their Lord >and Savior?
Depends what you mean by “accepting”. If you mean reciting the formula under a threat of death or under pressure of higher taxes, the answer is NO. However, if it is a sincere and voluntary first step to transform one’s life according to Christian principles, the answer is positive. You still are trying to convince me that Cortez asked the Indians to recite a kind of shahada and shot or taxed those who did not. I can assure you that Cortez would kill anybody for gold not God. Being raised Catholic he had a conscience (some kind of conscience), and, for example, he violently opposed human sacrifice practiced by the Aztecs.
>In previous posts you have compared Muslims to Nazis.
Read it again: with understanding. In the same vain I can claim that you compared Muslims to kamikaze. I don’t find kamikaze better than the Nazi.
>If you are truly alarmed by the volume of terrorism >you should want to learn what is causing it
In the case of narco-terrorism: money. In the case of islamic terrorism a true conviction on heavenly rewards based on the teaching of Mohamed. I want to see how it could be so massively perverted by so many terrorists. Many of them quite intelligent (e.g. major Hassan).
>Where are 99% of terrorists (non narcos) coming from? >There almost all dictatorships.
Was Mohamed a dictator or a highly democratic leader? Ayaan Hirsi Ali claims that Hussein, Ghadafi or the Saudi rulers follow the model of Mohamed.
>Between the two of us, I’m the only one not making >excuses for terrorism. How many times have you made >excuses for the terrorist organization the KKK? What I >have advocated time and again is the need to destroy >terrorists.
You are doing everything to obscure the root cause of terrorism. This makes any honest discussion impossible. To destroy terror, you must destroy the root cause of terror.
>>So do you think that the KKK did not dominate their victims (circa 1920’s)?
They did not dominate the US population. We managed to neutralize them.
>Have you ever heard of the Papal States?
Yes. Popes had terrible experience of being assassinated or kidnapped during the medieval times. Therefore they created their own defensive force supported by a territory known as a “papal state”. Indeed the Swiss guard (a defensive force), and Vatican, are remainders of that era. If the popes had secular ambitions, nothing would have stopped them from proclaiming themselves as caliphs of the European Empire. Some of them probably had such ambitions, but their successors corrected the course based on Christ’s teachings.
>I mean, I find you ignorance very entertaining but >what are you learning from this exchange?
I learned nothing, except that you are a dishonest apologist who doesn’t want to discuss the root cause of terror. Who cannot admit the difference between the mullahs and priests/pastors. Who wouldn’t admit the fundamental tenet of Islam that political and religious power must remain in the same hands. You cannot find any difference between the pope and ayatollah in terms of direct political power. I am not going to waste my time on you anymore.
