PJ Media

What is really needed is for a well funded group of honest scientists to start over again with honest data. I suspect this would be more efficient than trying to fix the corrupted data that has been so often published. By the way, it is a disgrace that reputable journals (Science, Nature, PNAS) published papers in which raw data and methods of analysis were hidden from critics. The editors who did this (assuming it was done) should be fired forthwith, and the peer reviewers who allowed it never be allowed to review another paper.