Thiagan,
Ok, now your post makes sense but your position is still false. Your list of jihads do not prove anything. I could just as easily cite the Crusades, the Spanish Inquisition, and the Reformation as examples that appear to justify terrorism in the name of Christianity; they don’t. Neither are the jihads you listed Islamic justification for terrorism. I’ve stated in previous articles that anyone can twist scripture from any religion and use it as basis for violence. That doesn’t justify terrorism.
My previous example and the its position are both correct. I noticed you didn’t explain how they’re not. Was it because they are in fact correct?
Actually groups you call gangs (like the FARC) are listed by the US State Department as terrorist organizations. http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/45323.pdf Narco terror attacks are aimed to frighten non-narcos and civilians into subjugation with large scale violence and killings of civilians and non-combatants. The final aim is domination of the countries they operate in and universal imposition of their will. Is that acceptable? The answer for me is NO for any kinds of terrorism.
Your opinion that Jesus abrogated the new OT and the NT is just your opinion. Every single Pope since the First Council of Nicaea has decided to keep the OT in the bible. You cannot claim to know more about Christianity than the leader of the majority of all Christians. Additionally your opinion is contradicted by the NT itself. Mathew 10:34-35 – Do not think that I came to bring peace on the earth, I did not come to bring peace, but the sword. For I came to set a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.
BTW, you stated in the in post #136 in article listed below: http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/islamist-perfidy-and-western-naivety-which-is-more-lethal/ that you support various acts of terrorism. You completely undermine your credibility advocating against terrorism when you condone it.
