Response to Distraught @56: Your posts are digressing into the absurd and your resort to juvinile ridicule is rather disappointing for someone who earlier claimed to want honest discussion. Instead of honest discussion you only offer misdirection. For example, I have never once argued for creationism. I simply pointed out that your definition of science was so off base that by your own definition evolution could not be taught in a science course. Your response was to explain how you urinate on your walls at home and that becomes your example of the scientific method. Oh, how we have advanced in the 21st century.
You also refused to address any of the issues I raised @ 55. Which of those four social conservative principles would you encourage us to compromise for the greater good? How would you define the greater good anyway? Who is to determine the greater good? Are we so arrogant that we think someone among us is so intelligent to dictate the greater good?
Please do not take the time to respond if you intend to do so with the same absurdity and vulgarity used @ 56. I have neither the time or the inclination to play hall monitor to a junior high intellectual.
