#1. The woman here IS the crimminal. (there can be no question of this, she confessed)
a.) She did not have permission to be on this man’s property.
b.) She admitted intentionally looking into the man’s window while trespassing on his property; which, in nearly all jurisdictions, is a crimminal offense of peeping.
#2. She took advantage, in an unethical & probably illegal way, of her relationship with law enforcement to violate more than one of the man’s consitutional rights. She used her influence to do harm to his person and reputation by causing a false arrest and prosecution.
I sincerely hope that this gentleman, and the greater community, does not just laugh and let this go. However you view it; gender discrimination, nanny-statism, prosecutorial malfeasance, law enforcement misconduct, etc. it is a symptom of a general disregard for individuals’ rights and a further break-down in our system of equal justice and common-sense in a civil society. The woman must be subjected to crimminal & civil laws and the police & prosecutor must be challenged. Whether they are ultimately punished in any significant way does not matter – they must be held to account. If not, we’ve all slid much further down the slope.
