@137. Moho: – You’re right, I used Wikipedia.
Yet you were too embarrassed to actually cite your copy/pasted irrelevancy, and too dense to realize anyone could figure out where it came from. A dangerous combination. Now that you’ve been outed you’re running away, screaming like a nine-year-old girl. Like I said: pathetic, desperate and, now, pwned. Of course I’m right, troll.
- The courts simply gave up on ruling on HC in the Padilla case.
No. They didn’t. The courts were coerced through judicial activism, political manipulation and hysterical pressure from a partisan Left Wing Media into giving an enemy combatant and prisoner of war a civilian criminal trial. And even with that undue, erroneously conferred benefit, his status as a terrorist was confirmed. It doesn’t GET any clearer than that. Like I said – karma’s a bitch.
If the courts had given up he’d have been left in the brig as an enemy combatant for the duration – which effectively ended with Teh One’s royal proclamation ending the War on Terror. I’m sure BHO hopes the jihadis got the memo. Meanwhile Ibrahim/Padilla/al-Muhajir is going to spend at least another 15 years in prison – all so that his crack legal team could mount a transparent attack on the Bush Administration, using him as a patsy.
Don’t worry though. When Ibrahim/Padilla/al-Muhajir is finally released – what… around 2025? – I’m sure he’ll be fully rehabilitated. I’m sure, with all those mind-numbing years spent bouncing off the walls of his cage, he’ll have completely forgotten how he was used as legal cannon fodder by the left to support their partisan war against the Republican Party. I’m sure the last thing on his convicted terrorist mind will be exacting retribution. The list of al Qaeda contacts he carried has long since been confiscated. So don’t lose any sleep over him. Or unintended consequences. Really.
- But Hamdi relates to Padilla just as it does to any citizen.
LOL!!!! You didn’t cite Hamdi, you boob! This shouldn’t surprise anyone, of course. After all, you seem to think Wikipedia is a reliable “source” for legal analysis. Given that, no one should expect you to know which case you referenced (twice).
Copying and pasting other people’s thoughts because you have none of your own is no way to go through life, sonny.
As for the case you DID reference, Kennedy and his partisan cohort can grind out socially suicidal, partisan decisions based on fantasy until their fingers bleed. Reality has a stubborn way of keeping its own counsel.
- You’ve used nothing …
Heh. Nothing but a single, easily digested line in the U.S. Constitution. It’s an easy document to find.
As for FDR’s racist internment of Japanese Americans, and his subsequent, impeachable crime of perjury in Korematsu, that’s all now public record. Easily verified. The repeal of unconstitutional portions of FDR’s so-called “New Deal” is also public record. Easily verified. And FDR’s craven ploy to stack the Supreme Court with justices sympathetic to his national socialist policies is public record as well. Ditto. All of that was airbrushed from the version of U.S. History you and I were brainwashed with in school, Mo. The difference between us is that I’ve made the effort to overcome it; you haven’t.
