Sounds like the author has realized that he better get on the side of the bread where the butter is spread. Is he bucking for a consulting job or some CNN time?
It isn’t fair to write and article based on a premise not examined or verified. First, what is the organization which published the rankings? Second, how did they obtain the data? Third, who did they interview to get their conclusions. If the company is a shill for Soros, the data was compiled from phone interviews with people in less than democratic countries with a a controlled media it could be argued that ranking number one is a bad thing! It would be like asking Putin and the mullahs of Iran if the decision to remove a missile defense from Poland was a good idea and the leading with headline “World leaders agree President Obama is number one good guy!”
Duh. I think I’ll hold my water on this one for a while. Bush rubbed a lot of people the wrong way because it made them make a decision- are you with us, or with the bad guys. In today’s world actually standing for something and then doing something about it is troublesome for many, especially the Europeans.
Hey, good luck on that stint with MSNBC and CNN. I’ll let you go because I’m sure Chris M. is trying to get you on the other line.
