A Comment About

Aborted Fetus Photos: In the New York Times, No Less

October 21, 2009 - 12:24 am - by La Shawn Barber
subcutaneous
2009-10-21 09:44:35

Moho says:
” Here’s the difference between Tiller and Pouillon.”

I say: “Here’s the difference between pro-life and “pro-choice” – you see some humans as more worthy of life (and other “rights”) than others. Because Tiller provided a “service”, his death deserved coverage. Because Poullion was “not a central personage”, his murder warranted no coverage.
In God’s eyes, both murders were wrong and deserved similar treatment and sadness.

In much the same way, a preborn baby and a 16 year old are both humans and deserve equal protection.

How sad that you can’t see that over your lib talking point sheet.