Moho says:
” Here’s the difference between Tiller and Pouillon.”
I say: “Here’s the difference between pro-life and “pro-choice” – you see some humans as more worthy of life (and other “rights”) than others. Because Tiller provided a “service”, his death deserved coverage. Because Poullion was “not a central personage”, his murder warranted no coverage.
In God’s eyes, both murders were wrong and deserved similar treatment and sadness.
In much the same way, a preborn baby and a 16 year old are both humans and deserve equal protection.
How sad that you can’t see that over your lib talking point sheet.





