Philly Police Scandal Needs Sober Analysis, Not Rev. Al’s Bullhorn
To the commenter who calls himself I.M. Copper,
Thank you for acknowledging the validity of some of the points I raised. Perhaps you might care to address some of those points instead of casting aspersions upon myself, my friends, my educational achievements and place in our economic sphere.
A quick glance at McKay’s post by anyone with adequate reading skills clearly indicates that he is an experienced older former LEO. A former LEO who is disgusted by unprofessional behavior of current practioners of his former profession.
Society has placed a
great deal of trust and power in the hands of police officers. McKay believes to be worthy of that trust police should be held to a higher degree of accountability when they break the law.
The primary question remains, what are suitable consequences for public servants who violate our trust by abusing the power placed in thier hands?
You opine that perhaps the Philly officers were illegal. Let us assume for a moment that you are correct, that this example of pulling citizens out of a car and beating and kicking them is illegal, is a crime. Plainly put, that these officers are indeed criminals. What is suitable punishment for criminals who violate society’s trust? Should police be held accountable for thier actions or are they above the law they are hired to uphold?
Perhaps after we discuss suitable punishment for criminals shielded by a badge we can address suitable consequences for the negligent officers whose incompetence results in homicide. What should we do with trained professionals who kill by accident?
I have no fear of law abiding police officers who do not commit assaults or homicides. I willingly place my trust in men who uphold the law, the
Constitution and do not perjure themselves. But respect is hard earned and easily lost. I truly wish all police were worthy of respect and trust.
