Obama’s foreign policy regarding Hamas, Hizbullah and Islamic regime of Iran is that of face-to-face negotiations without any preconditions. This card played by Obama may sound his losing card but there is something fishy in that. The way events could unfold in the next five or six months would probably spin in Obama’s favour. For example, Iranians could announce nearer to the election time in November – so as not to give the Bush Administration any chance of reassessing the situation – that they are prepared to discuss some possibilities of halting their nuclear activities for a period of time and that they will consider some other US demands regarding the Iraqi situation. Talks like this will become more prevalent. We will hear suggestions that the Russians will produce the Iranian nuclear fuel inside Iran but under strict controls and certain aspect of the production will be in black boxes and the Iranians will hint that they will be happy with that (already a suggestion by the Russians). Do these suggest that Obama knows (given assurances by the terrorists) how the Islamic regime will behave in a few months time to back up his presidential campaign? Otherwise, why has he made Iran the focal point of his campaign? There is something fishy about Obama.
The GOP and McCain must be prepared for change of tactics by the terrorists and Iranian regime behind Obama’s presidential campaign and leave themselves room to manoeuvre.
