per political reacharound: “I don’t understand you people. Despite what this guy says, he is not a scientist and the facts are there which support global warming.”
Free clue: despite what Al Gore says, he is not a scientist. Despite what YOU say, the article lays out only PART the spate of evidence and data that contradicts the computer models that AGW is based on, that the Goracle relied upon.
Second free clue: if the “debate is “over”, then why so much debate among REAL climatologists, an elite group that neither Gore or YOU are members of?
Your continual use of the terms “consensus” and “majority” show that you are completely clueless about science. Science NEVER achieves finality.
Newton and Galileo trumped Aristotle. Mach and Einstein trumped Newton. Bohr et al trumped Einstein at the “low end”.
And so it goes.
Or maybe you have other examples in science where “the debate is over”?
A breathless world awaits your wisdom!
