A Comment About

Talking Back to the Talkbackers

September 25, 2009 - 12:00 am - by David Solway
cfbleachers
2009-09-27 15:14:30

Now and then

No, I don’t.

1) A group of “A’s” stereotypes all B’s as lazy, shiftless, ignorant and worthless

2) C then stereotypes ALL A’s as ignorant, homophobic, racist AND accuses them of engaging in stereotyping, which C labels as unsupportable behavior.

I view what happens in (2) above…and call out the hypocrisy in it.

That’s not irony…it’s a form of logic via syllogism.

You, on the other hand…blindly defend the indefensible. Do you see the irony in that? Anyone?