@34. David S: – I guess that qualifier “perhaps” didn’t mean a thing to you.
Sure it did. I was curious to see if you’re really intellectually dishonest enough to think it changes the meaning of what you wrote, and – surprise! – you really are that dishonest.
If it was your intention to merely equivocate and, thus, say nothing of substance whatsoever, then you should have kept your idiotic drivel to yourself, Zippy. Because backpedaling away from your asinine, idiotic, demonstrably false assertion, using a pathetically lame fallacy of equivocation, says pretty much the same thing.
On the rest of your silly-ass notions, when you get some actual real-life experience to shore (heh) up your 6-year-long, unsuccessful education, you’ll eventually come to realize that socialism in theory is very different from socialism in practice.
Ultimately, socialism in practice can’t exist without a totalitarian mechanism to enforce it because it’s not an inherently sustainable social structure, built as it is on morally adolescent ideology. Every version of the socialist experiment has demonstrated this or is in the process of doing so, as you’ve already been instructed… back where you lied. And you were caught. And you were pwned.
You’ve rendered your own commentary irrelevant, Zippy.
