DAN:
Sure would be nice if you practiced the type of accurate analysis you call for in others.
It’s HILARIOUSLY ironic that you don’t acknowledge either the fact that (a) a HUGE number of California legislators OPPOSED passage of the bill and (b) and EVEN HUGER segment, the vast majority, of the actual voters opposed the bill and (c) ONLY ONE JUDGE made the difference in the California court’s 4-3 decision.
Your arrogance and condescension is a really good illustration of why progress isn’t made on this issue. As the Wall Street Journal points out, the decision will not result in gay unions earning the respect they long for in society, but will only be cause for bitterness and resentment the same as Roe v. Wade has engendered.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121089440635197017.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
