Frankly, it’s self-evident to me that women are the more selfish of the sexes. The above-poster’s observation is undoubtedly true: these books flatter women comnig and going because they are the target audience. Yet the fact that this should be so also highlights women’s apparently generally greater interest in ego-soothing and gratifying – consider the shopping phenomenon, which essentially consists in buying a continual stream of presents for one’s self. It occurs to me that the supposed conspiracy-of-males ethos just pummelled into oblivion or deep corners of the red states is in reality a simple socializing regime to prevent women’s natural egotism from overwhelming the need for familial exclusivity. Of course there is male misbehavior as well, but just as in sex if there is no erection there is no sex, so in family if there is no female exclusivity there is no family. Simple biology and anatomy impose these limitations; it is mere hubris to try to theorize your way out of them. Deny this all you like; personally, I was raised to believe that this was not the case, that partners were equal – and indeed I think that, in the absence of instruction, that’s simply the natural sensibility between two people, two friends, as between lovers. Sadly, I find it very hard at this point to believe that anymore. It seems as though women would rather be, essentially, bought; to treat them in more equitable terms, which requires a certain recognition of quid pro quo, is to invite their complete disdain. It is hard to avoid the conclusion that, in truth, they are big children, with a certain incapacity for empathy. I’m beginning to think women’s famed empathy is less the genuine thing than something more like the eyebrows on a dog. Women want to be well-ruled – period. God I wish it wasn’t like this – I like the model encouraged by the feminist myth! But just try it out – 8 out of 10 times you will be amazed that the theory was invented simply to flatter women and flumox men. Yet another Eve-like example of female treachery.
- Home
- Columnists
- J. Christian Adams
Rule of Law - Ed Driscoll
EdDriscoll.com - Richard Fernandez
Belmont Club - Stephen Green
Vodkapundit - Victor Davis Hanson
Works and Days - Roger Kimball
Roger’s Rules - Andrew Klavan
Klavan on Culture - Michael Ledeen
Faster, Please! - Andrew McCarthy
Ordered Liberty - Ron Radosh
Ron Radosh - Claudia Rosett
The Rosett Report - Barry Rubin
Rubin Reports - Roger L. Simon
Roger L. Simon - Dr. Helen Smith
Dr. Helen - Spengler
David P. Goldman - Zombie
Zombie - Belladonna Rogers
Belladonna Rogers - Janine Turner
Janine Turner
- J. Christian Adams
- PJ Tatler
- PJ Lifestyle
- Instapundit
- PJTV
- PJ Institute
dan
2008-05-15 06:54:18
MOST POPULAR
- 10 Reasons You Should Skip Traditional Publishers and Self-Publish Ebooks Instead
by Robert Bidinotto - America Gets a Wake-Up Call
by Roger L Simon - How About We Compare the Investment Records of Bain Capital and the Obama Administration?
by David H. Horwich - 'I Would Rather Have Everyone Exercise. But You Can’t Ignore the Data.'
by Helen Smith - What Does the Success of the Dragon Mean?
by Rand Simberg - No Anti-Obama Jews Wanted in These Synagogues
by Abraham H. Miller - Muslim Journalist Challenges Sharia, Gets Accused of 'Hate'
by Robert Spencer - Obama Reframes His Frugal Spending Claim
by Tom Blumer - If Obama Doesn't Understand European History He Can't Get America's Future History Right
by Barry Rubin - Barack Obama and Elizabeth Warren, and the Party of Hollow Braggarts
by Bryan Preston
THE EDITORS @ PJM
- J. Christian AdamsLegal Editor
- Ed DriscollSan Jose
- Stephen GreenDenver
- Aaron HanscomLos Angeles
- Bridget JohnsonWashington D.C.
- Rick MoranChicago
- Bryan PrestonAustin
- Glenn Harlan ReynoldsTennessee
- Barry RubinMiddle East
- Roger L SimonHollywood
- David SteinbergNew York
- Dave SwindleLos Angeles
Home | About Us | Media | Advertising | Tips For PJM | Archive | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Contact Us
Copyright © 2005-2012 PJ Media All Rights Reserved. v1.27.2




