If your genuine position is anti-illegal immigration, that position itself gives you no reason to oppose the simplest solution to illegal immigration, as offered by Harry Binswanger — make them legal.
Good grief! So, if I’m anti-bank-robbery, and somebody proposes to “solve” the problem by making robbing banks legal, and I don’t go along with it, then I’m not really anti-bank-robbery after all?
The contortions you people go through in an effort to justify that which cannot be justified is worthy of a liberal Democrat. If illegal immigration is wrong, then it’s not going to magically become right by rewarding tens of million of felons.
Nessus has voted. Anybody else?
I vote that you attempt to make arguments in support of your position. Otherwise, I’ll start to think that you have no arguments.
