mbviews
2008-05-14 11:52:11
Totally agree.
1. As you mention where are the conservative sources to cite in the first place.
2.
You left out my biggest complaint.
The inclusion of a section about “controversies” or “countering views” or “opposing views”. How are there countering views to facts? It’s either fact or it isn’t.
And then where do you draw the line?
And what about issues? LGBT has gone through and added their assessment on lots of congress members. Does every organization then get a chance to say the score and views of that congress member. Can ATR list a section for every congressmember?
