Ratatosk: The link I posted in the first comment has all the proof you need from four different scientific research groups (HadCRUT, RSS, UAH, and GISS)… all are relied on by the IPCC. No warming, it’s plateaued. Don’t scientific theories need proof? If global warming advocates have predicted warming for ten years, and it hasn’t warmed… shouldn’t there be some rethinking going on?
Quarnstorm: Facts trump theory. Since there’s been no significant warming since 1998, and now there’s no warming predicted ’til 2015 because of La Nina (see the journal Nature), then surely someone will point out that the global warming models aren’t working? Or is this theory immune to facts? Meanwhile RealClimate is trying to discredit the German Marine scientists who made the prediction. That site seems controlled more by gadflies than people who behave like sober scientists.
Boris: How has that body managed to ignore that, as the head of the IPCC admitted, global warming has plaeaued? (See: Climate Facts)
Politicalreacharound: Good luck with that approach! You’re sooo much smarter than the rest of us, and your name-calling convinces us all of your positions. You’re helping the cause I’m sure.
For those of you criticizing us Global Warmism skeptics because we are contradicting “Science”:
Here’s 103 scientists who disagree with the global warmist alarmism: Open Letter to the Secretary-General of the United Nations. Ever here of the Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change from the International Science Climate Coalition?
