Hey Boris,
Take your own medicine. There was nothing in that previous post that said the two year cycle of cooling was total proof, it just showed that the folks who believe in constant upward trends of temperature every year are wrong. PRA didn’t want to look at that.
Take a look at the what the head of the NOAA says – “The problem here is that climate is inherently unpredictable and currently of little more than entertainment value. What is important is weather and its forecasting, hopefully a season or two in advance. Over the decades, as we untangle more of the cycles involved in climate, we may be able to predict multidecadal warming and cooling cycles (most importantly how these will affect precipitation regionally) and these will be useful policy tools but nothing in our current or foreseeable abilities makes climate worthy of special attention. Note we have an appalling record of predicting such well-studied and critical annual and multiannual cycles as ISMR (Indian Summer Monsoon Rainfall) and ENSO (El Niño southern Oscillation) and these have massive agricultural importance to the world. Stick to the weather — despite appearances we are beginning to understand some of it.”
In other words, the 100-year climate models are not accurate. If you watch the weather you know they can’t even figure the weather right a week into the future, let alone 100 years.
Oh yeah – ask those poor bastards in China who have suffered through the worst winter in a half century if they believe in anthropogenic global warming. Keep in mind that the Chinese are the world’s leading CO2 generators.
