PJ Media

@61. Marie Claude: – There was no AQ in Irak, they came into her after the fall of the regime,…

There’s not much hard evidence to support any assertions on what was going on before Saddam’s ouster. The only important fact is that al Qaeda was decimated and defeated – in Iraq. That was the hill they chose to die on, and they did – despite the Democrats’, the international media’s and the U.N.’s efforts to make them victorious over Coalition forces.

- Of course, the first war had an objective goal, Saddam had invaded a proxy neighbour, while for the second, it was a lazy choice, …
Lazy… as in the U.N. being too lazy to enforce its sanctions, yes.

Realize that none of the countries you mentioned attacked the U.S. That’s part of understanding the so-called “Bush Doctrine” and the American response to Radical Islam’s War Against the Rest of the World. That response was overwhelmingly supported here after 9/11. It was an effort to eradicated islamist terrorist elements and rogue regimes – like Saddam’s – which funded and supported them. Hillary said it best.

As for Iran and Afghanistan, if they’re taunting anyone it’s because the U.N. – once again – has refused to enforce its resolutions and do its job, and the UNSC members refuse to take responsibility for ending Radical Islam’s reign of terror. Like the welfare recipients here in the U.S. who whine about “the rich” who pay all the taxes, the idle countries chastise those who act, trying to make themselves out to be morally superior. It’s not working.

- Not quite, people in the offices knew that about 3 months before the UN clash, this is why were forged rumors, to empech the french Veto.
Sorry, can’t make out what you’re saying here. Is this a new conspiracy you’re alleging?

And yes, I kept having to remind myself that “Dominique” was a man.