A Comment About

Reading the Ron Paul Revolution

May 12, 2008 - 12:00 am - by Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Matt Young
2008-05-12 10:12:35

I read the book in 4 and a half hours. I highly recommend it to anyone here who is bagging on Dr. Paul to read it first. Many of you have deep misconceptions. It’s like you guys are reviewing the work based on cliffnotes or just this guys review.

I am appreciative of his review, however much I disagree w/ the incremental noncence. It is going to simply be a knockdown drag out war of ideas. Perhaps Dr. Paul should have written more on his plans to get all those “Ron Paul Clone” senators and congressman and reps throughout the country elected (which he IS doing)… The reason I think he left alot of that out is just to keep the book short enough to get people through it, and give them some idea of what went on and is going on. If it fires them up then they’ll start loking at options which he group will let them know what is happening… no reason to show all of your cards, right?

I mean the fact that 1 million people have voted for Paul shows that the “Revolution” is without a doubt, making inroads. If people are not so fearful of these ideas, and happen to run into a pleasant, educated & non-forceful “Paultard” vs. one of our problematic Alex Jones/KKK/Paranoid delusional quacks then we maight slowly get some more inroads to these ideas eventually trickling down to the last bit of the people enamored w/ Big Brother shows, US magazine and Brittney Spears.

One might read this Ron Paul book first as I feel it may explain the ideas of Libertarianism in a simpler way… before jumping right in to Dr. Paul’s new book…
Either way, please read a bit before just jumping on this reviewers bandwagon: