As I commented above, my article was primarily meant to examine the relative merits of the two scenarios: the release of al-Megrahi on compassionate grounds vs. The release of terrorists as a humanitarian gesture.
Judging by the responses on this forum to date, I completely missed the mark in conveying my message. There is not one comment examining the compromises Israel has been forced to make for in this regard and US complicity in the build-up of international pressure on “goodwill gestures” (particularly under the current administration).
In a debate on the absolute merits of releasing al-Megrahi, I’d probably side with Sir Alan of Lothian III. The Lockerbie bombing is far from an “open and shut case”. Remember this is a criminal case, so saying he probably did it is not enough. We need certainty beyond reasonable doubt – and I think some doubt exists. Whether it is reasonable or not was up to good appeal judges to determine but to the extent that an appeal process could not be completed, there is some merit in compassionate release (Ok, perhaps with more strings attached to ensure he did not receive a hero’s welcome).
Now it is very possible that this deal was influenced by UK’s commercial interests, and if that was the only motive, I would strongly oppose the deal. Remember too that US pressure on Israel may also have something to do with appeasing the Saudis.
Anyway, let the debate continue on a more respectful tone…
Eli
P.S. Without sounding unintelligent, incoherent or unknowledgeable – what is this FETEKE you speak of. The fountain of knowledge, Google, suggests you may be referring to an independent petroleum consulting firm or a renowned mathematician and monetary scientist
