While not a huge issue, actually, if you go to the press release from the AJM, they list Himmelstein as one of the authors. It appears they list the authors in alphabetical order, so it’s doubtful that his name being first is meaningful.
The article is “Medical Bankruptcy in the United States, 2007: Results of a National Study” by David U. Himmelstein, M.D., Deborah Thorne, Ph.D., Elizabeth Warren, J.D., and Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H. It appears in The American Journal of Medicine, Volume 122, Issue 8 (August 2009) published by Elsevier.
I’d say its quite obvious that the DOJ study is useless for actually analyzing the study by Woolhandler.
Yes, I had no doubt that you would say that. Interesting that all you’ve got to back it up is the claim that the DOJ was “hyperpartisan” and therefore it’s study is flawed. Way to confirm your status as a political hack imitating an objective analyst.
Also, since I’ve decided not to waste any more time on you, go here
http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/elizabeth_warren_and_the_terri.php
and here
http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/06/why_warrens_new_bankruptcy_stu.php
for more detailed takedowns.
jharp,
94
Still trying to rhetorically intimidate people, I see. How’s that workin’ out for ya?
I strongly suggest that you stick to the teabagging.
None of the things I would strongly suggest to you would make it past the PJM filter, so I’m not going to bother. Just let your imagination run wild, then double it. That’s what I’d strongly suggest to you.
