You both-goy and Pelto–are kidding yourself in assuming the unconstitutionality of nationalized healthcare. Your obstinate insistence on refusing to acknolwledge reality is one big problem for you.
Please tell me why the “general welafre” clause isn’t enough constitutional justification (hint: your simple disagreement with prior supreme court decisions upholding the general welfare clause as authority is not really an argument, any more than people who insist the earth is flat have an “argument.”).
The two main reasons people opppose govt healthcare are: one, because we prudently oppose government control of anything; two, because aside from the danger of government control, it will deprive us of free choice and be ineptly run for the benefit of govt unionized employees.
But if you want to start arguiing the elgality of it, you’re out there with the legal luddites that insist that the income tax is illegal etc. Do you really want to blow your credibility on such a untenable basis?
